Probation and Parole- More Than a Way of Getting Criminals out of Research Paper

Probation and Parole- More Than a Way of Getting Criminals out of Prison - Research Paper theoretical accountIn recent years there has been a problem in the United States of the prison house universe rapidly growing, which has been causing financial problems as well as issues with finding the space to incarcerate the criminals . As a consequence, there has been a trend towards probation and parole as methods of getting criminals out of prison former and back in society. In addition to reducing prison population, it is thought that this may also answer the individualistics to successfully rehabilitate into society, reducing their rate of recidivism. Although studies indicate that the success of probation and parole may be limited, the turn nevertheless appears to be effective for some individuals, and there are processes that give notice be belowtaken to increase this effectiveness. preponderance of Probation/Parole Parole and probation are widely used as means of justice, an d these are often considered to be community corrections. Probation is part of the sentence that is initially handed from the judge when following a trial. It can bechance in addition to or instead of time in prison. Parole occurs when an inmate is conditionally released from prison after serving all or a part of his sentence. In both cases the individual is at a lower place a set of conditions, such as they are not allowed t associate with certain individuals, cannot rely crimes or visit certain locations. If the individual breaks these conditions, then they are subject to imprisonment. In m any cases the wrongdoers attendance to these conditions is determined by their supervision by a parole or probation officer. The outcome of individuals under community correction at any given time is full(prenominal), much higher than that of the prison population. For example, in 2003, there were around 2.1 million adults incarcerated, but approximately 4.8 million undergoing either paro le or probation . These numbers were not unique to that year, but instead represent the general trend . There is no unified system for probation and parole across states. Instead each state has their own guidelines and laws surrounding the set in which criminals are eligible, the length, restrictions that are placed on the individual and other factors . Because of this, the manner in which individual supervisors treat those they are in charge of differs significantly between different people, cities and states . The recent changes in sentencing laws sop up resulted in an increase in the number of people who are receiving community corrections . It is likely that any solution to the problem of high numbers of incarcerated inmates will result in increases to the number of people under probation and parole . This will result in an increased workload for those involved in supervision of offenders. The originator of officers has increased significantly in recent times. Currently many parole and probation officers are able to tend weapons, as well as administer drug tests to determine whether the offender is remaining drug throw in . Effectiveness One of the key roles of probation and parole is to reduce the rate of criminals reoffending. This is an important issue, as more than ii thirds of released prisoners have been found to reoffend within three years of their release . Studies have shown that while probation and parole can be effective as a method of sentencing for many individuals, the rate of recidivism remains very high . One factor that limits the effectiveness of probation is the fact that a large number of people on probation and par